[Kde-pim] Should we switch from KDE_fseek to QT_FSEEK, etc. ? was: Re: kmail doesn't compile from trunk on Slackware GNU/Linux

[Jarosław Staniek]

Giovanni Venturi said the following, On 2008-01-24 15:15:
> Alle giovedì 24 gennaio 2008, Jarosław Staniek ha scritto:
>> Giovanni Venturi said the following, On 2008-01-24 14:22:
>>> Alle giovedì 24 gennaio 2008, Allen Winter ha scritto:
>>>> On Thursday 24 January 2008 05:52:24 Giovanni Venturi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Please tell me your platform and compiler and
>>>> what version of glibc (if you are on a glibc system)
>>> GNU/Linux Slackwarre-current. Linux 2.6.23.14, gcc 4.1.2, glibc 2.7
>> I guees you are compiling for 64 bits?
> No, no. I've got a Centrino that has 3-4 years. no 64 bits.
>> Giovanni, KDE_fseek == fseek64 was a mistake and will be fixed - please
>> replace that with QT_FSEEK or fseek locally in the kmail code.
> Ok, and than I can't commit the fix because you intend to fix it in another 
> way. Did I understand? :)

Hmm, right. Or just change to fseek() and commit - we (or juniors?) will be 
probably inspecting all the KDE code for such functions.

-- 
regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek
  Sponsored by OpenOffice Polska (http://www.openoffice.com.pl/en) to work on
  Kexi & KOffice (http://www.kexi.pl/en, http://www.koffice.org/kexi)
  KDE Libraries for MS Windows (http://windows.kde.org)
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/