[Kde-pim] Should we switch from KDE_fseek to QT_FSEEK, etc. ? was: Re: kmail doesn't compile from trunk on Slackware GNU/Linux

[Giovanni Venturi]

Alle giovedì 24 gennaio 2008, Jarosław Staniek ha scritto:
> Giovanni Venturi said the following, On 2008-01-24 14:22:
> > Alle giovedì 24 gennaio 2008, Allen Winter ha scritto:
> >> On Thursday 24 January 2008 05:52:24 Giovanni Venturi wrote:
> >>
> >> Please tell me your platform and compiler and
> >> what version of glibc (if you are on a glibc system)
> >
> > GNU/Linux Slackwarre-current. Linux 2.6.23.14, gcc 4.1.2, glibc 2.7
>
> I guees you are compiling for 64 bits?
No, no. I've got a Centrino that has 3-4 years. no 64 bits.
> Giovanni, KDE_fseek == fseek64 was a mistake and will be fixed - please
> replace that with QT_FSEEK or fseek locally in the kmail code.
Ok, and than I can't commit the fix because you intend to fix it in another 
way. Did I understand? :)
Giovanni
-- 
A KDE Italian translator and KSniffer core developer
Slackware GNU/Linux current version - kernel 2.6.23.14
KDE Italia - http://www.kde-it.org/
KSniffer Project - http://www.ksniffer.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20080124/57d2a570/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/