[Kde-pim] Classical recipient editor in KMail

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Friday 16 November 2007, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Friday 16 November 2007 13:25:24 Thomas McGuire wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > KMail has a hidden setting which apparently can enable a classical
> > recipient editor.
> > Because of this, the code is littered with things like
> >
> > >  if ( mClassicalRecipients ) {
> > >    ..
> > >  }
> > >  else {
> > >    ..
> > >  }
> >
> > And of course, the classical recipient editor never gets testing
> > and was not ported at all. I've enabled it, and as soon as the
> > composer opens, KMail crashes.
> >
> > I think we should remove the classical recipient editor completely.
>
> Agree.  Classical Recipents should be removed for 4.0

Yes, please remove it.


> Or are there reasons to keep it? Why did we decide to use to different
> recipient editors at all?

You know how people are. They don't like changes. And since a few people 
strongly complained about the new recipient editor we didn't remove the 
classical editor with the introduction of the new one.


Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20071116/a1e4b8db/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/