[Kde-pim] Relicense request for servertest.*

[Michael Häckel]

Hi all,

Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 schrieb Tom Albers:
> Op di 8 mei 2007 22:55 schreef u:
>
> Yep. You think I'm doing this because I've fun in it? Finding the licensees
> and asking permission is stupid work, dealing with bounces and googling for
> recent addressess sucks even more.
>
> > Ok, here's my answer: the servertest stuff is crap. It abuses the info
> > channel to the kioslaves to report back capabilities. I don't want this
> > to be alive by KDE4, so no, I don't agree to the relicensing. Write
> > something that doesn't suck from scratch :)
>
> Thanks for the help and taking the time to educate me on the right
> solution.

I think that the GPL is a very good licence and an open source project like 
KDE actually should not need LGPL code at all. Nevertheless from my point of 
view you can change the licence if you want and are able to convice the 
others.

I don't know why all code not written by Marc Mutz is crap though...

With best regards,
Michael Häckel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20070510/673138b7/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
kde-pim mailing list
kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
kde-pim home page at http://pim.kde.org/