[Kde-pim] [REGRESSION] Pop3 message status change is broken on Enterprise branch

[Volker Krause]

On Thursday 20 December 2007 21:01:45 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Thursday 20 December 2007, Volker Krause wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 December 2007 14:27:05 Ismail Dönmez wrote:
> > > Wednesday 19 December 2007 12:47:31 tarihinde Volker Krause şunları
> >
> > yazmıştı:
> > > > On Friday 14 December 2007 23:40:30 Ismail Dönmez wrote:
> > > > > Monday 03 December 2007 11:43:50 tarihinde Ismail Dönmez
> > > > > şunları
> >
> > yazmıştı:
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A commit between 13 November - 23 November breaks changing
> > > > > > message status changing with pop3 such that;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Changing a message to be unread
> > > > > > - Changing a message to be read
> > > > > >
> > > > > > does not work, however changing a thread to be read/unread
> > > > > > works. The most likely commit is Volker's message action
> > > > > > work. Anyone experienced a similar problem?
> > > > >
> > > > > Is anyone able to reproduce this? Still doesn't work with
> > > > > latest enterprise branch here.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for the delay. I'm unable to reproduce this, changing the
> > > > message status of local messages works here with all ways
> > > > (context menu on header list and reader window, menu in main
> > > > window and separate reader window, clicking on the status
> > > > column). What exactly are you doing, are all ways to change the
> > > > status broken? Are all local folders affected by this problem?
> > >
> > > Further investigation shows that starting with a clean KMail config
> > > fixes that, so it might be some backward compatibility breakage.
> >
> > Since apparently only the triggering of the status change operation
> > is broken and not the actual status changing itself, the only thing I
> > could think of are the XMLGUI .rc files, although that would usually
> > hide the action altogether. Also, there is nothing special for local
> > folders in that area. Do you still have the old files for comparison?
>
> This is just a wild guess, but at least IMAP folders seem to have
> a "readonly" property. Maybe for some reason (I guess readonly=true is
> a safe default for IMAP folders) the local folders were marked as
> readonly (?).

I thought about this as well, but according to my tests (on IMAP, not sure how 
to trigger readonly local folders) you get a different behaviour in this case: 
the unread/new/read status is unaffected, all other status actions are 
disabled, for single messages as well as for threads unless 
the "AllowLocalFlags" option is activated (it isn't by default in 
enterprise). 

regards
Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-pim/attachments/20071221/6b4d2eda/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM mailing list kde-pim at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-pim
KDE PIM home page at http://pim.kde.org/