[Kde-perl] Signals & Slots

Thomas Fjellstrom tfjellstrom at telusplanet.net
Fri Jun 6 09:49:05 CEST 2003


On June 6, 2003 01:34 am, Lutz Badenheuer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, 6. Juni 2003 03:02 schrieb Ashley Winters:
> > I like the SIGNAL( int ) syntax, but I'll probably want to have a
> > named signal interface anyways, since Perl doesn't support
> > overloading on parameters... SLOT( resize(int, int) ) vs. SLOT(
> > resize(const QSize &) ). However, I much prefer SLOT( const QSize &
> > ). :)
> >
> > Although, if someone prefers Signal() and Slot(), speak up...
>
> This seems nice and doesn't ... yell at me :), but OTOH looks much
> clearer to me than in lowercase.
>

While the upper case ones are loud, the C++ defines are upper case are they 
not? Wouldn't it be good to keep it somewhat similar?

-- 
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@(telusplanet|strangesoft).net
http://strangesoft.net



More information about the Kde-perl mailing list