Static functions

[Bo Thorsen]

On Monday 12 January 2004 15:08, David Leimbach wrote:
> Hello Bo,
>
> On Jan 12, 2004, at 7:56 AM, Bo Thorsen wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just convinced myself it was time to remind everyone of this old
> > feature: Static functions. I know lots of you already know about this
> > feature, but I've seen too many places where it isn't used, so I
> > thought
> > I'd give a heads up on it.
> > ...
> How you feel about achieving the same goal with anonymous namespaces?

I don't "feel" anything about it - if the symbols are gone from the symbol 
table, then that's all good. But I don't believe so, the file static 
functions are necessary to achieve this. Prove me wrong :-)

Bo.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-optimize/attachments/20040112/4be941c8/attachment.pgp