Comparing KHTML in Quanta and Konq

[Maksim Orlovich]

yOn Wed, 28 May 2003, Carsten Pfeiffer wrote:
> >
> > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52022 suggests it may be due to
> > konq_history.
> 
> Saving several megabytes again and again surely affects performance, yes. We 
> might delegate the saving to a kded module that only saves upon request and 
> not everytime a page is visited.

I also recall doing dcop broadcasts to update history taking nearly 12ms
per process or so (if you recall the change to prevent broadcasts of 
about:konqueror updates that I suggested to speed up the startup); 
perhaps getting only a single kded module as a destination and making 
it lazily (or pull?) propagate it could help the performance, too,
but that's getting tricky & needs measurements.