a text on optimizing C++

[Waldo Bastian]

On Friday 24 January 2003 20:07, Martijn Klingens wrote:
> On Friday 24 January 2003 14:13, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> >  {
> >  KConfig cfg( "somerc" );
> >  cfg.writeEntry( "Entry", "Value" );
> >  }
> >
> >  is exactly the same (and the {}'s are not needed if the calling of the
> > destructor may wait until the end of the function/block it's in). It
> > saves one dynamic allocation and deallocation, and there will be no leak.
>
> What are your thoughts on
>
> KConfig( "somerc" ).writeEntry( ... );
>
> then? I sometimes tend to fold statements together like this but I hardly
> see it done elsewhere, making me wonder if it's maybe a bad habit of mine.

It only works as long as you need to write one entry.

Cheers,
Waldo
-- 
bastian@kde.org -=|[ SuSE, The Linux Desktop Experts ]|=- bastian@suse.com