Working together on NM09 support and cleaning Solid::Control

[Lamarque Vieira Souza]

Em Wednesday 18 May 2011, Will Stephenson escreveu:
> On Wednesday 18 May 2011 16:53:35 Lamarque Vieira Souza wrote:
> >         #1 should be based in nm09 instead of master in my oppinion. In
> >         the future we will need to branch master to nm08 and move the 
> >         NM-0.9 code to master, but not now.
> 
> Ok, just a branch name, we can do it either way around.

	I see you created the libnm-qt branch based on master instead of nm09. 
There are several fixes in nm09 that should be applied in libnm-qt. If you had 
created it based on nm09 branch we could cherry-pick the changes in nm09 to 
the libnm-qt branch from now on, like we have been doing for the commits in 
master that are usefull in nm09 branch. Now we will have to revisit all 
commits in nm09 branch to find which one should also be applied to libnm-qt 
branch before we could start cherry picking commits from nm09 branch :-/

-- 
Lamarque V. Souza
http://www.geographicguide.com/brazil.htm
Linux User #57137 - http://counter.li.org/
http://planetkde.org/pt-br
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-networkmanager/attachments/20110520/138025a5/attachment.html