Compiling version 0.2 on Fedora 7

[Beso]

i'd advise the users not to install the new libnl..... there is something
that breaks networkmanager. after having it and knm installed fine i had
some troubles with networkmanager itself after restart. it seems that there
is something that doesn't work well inside.
i'll try having a look inside this from sunday and see if i can figure out
something.

2007/11/22, Beso <givemesugarr at gmail.com>:
>
> i've added here http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197450
> the new ebuild and tar.gz
> for now i just unpacked and repacked libnl with the right name since i
> don't have much time to work on it.
> maybe sunday i'll have some spare time to fix this issue too. it won't
> take much but now i'm having some other things to do, but since this is
> required to build knetworkmanager from source i did it in the fast way.
> this should also work for people not using gentoo:
> download the libnl.tar.gz, download the libnl-1.0_pre8.tar.gz, unpack
> them, go to the libnl-1.0_pre8 dir and do
> patch -p1< "the 2 patches in the libnl.tar ", ./configure
> --libdir=/"your_lib_dir" && make && make install && cd include && make
> install (the second is needed to install also the includes).
> after that try compiling knm from svn and see that it works. you'll then
> have an updated netlink library and an updated knetworkmanager.
>
> 2007/11/22, Ryan Daly <daly at ctcnet.net>:
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 01:07 +0100, Robert Buchholz wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 22. November 2007, Ryan Daly wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 21:51 +0100, Robert Buchholz wrote:
> > > > > On Wednesday, 21. November 2007, Beso wrote:
> > > > > > the patch works fine with 1.0_pre6, which i have installed and
> > > > > > applies very well on its source. this is made because the
> > > > > > 1.0_pre6 has changed some functions and many programs still call
> >
> > > > > > in the old functions. the 1.0_pre5 also had something modified
> > > > > > for suse (since knm was developed as a suse project) for what
> > > > > > i've learned (but for this assertion maybe some other dev could
> > > > > > help confirm that) and needs a patch for other distros.
> > > > >
> > > > > Problem here is that the ebuild called "1.0_pre6" is not actually
> > > > > pre6, but a state after pre5 and before the release of pre6. As
> > far
> > > > > as the API parts KNM uses, it is "pre5".
> > > > >
> > > > > If you want to, please open a bug about this and cc me on it.
> > > > > Because right now, we might not have a version of libnl that will
> > > > > support the new knm release in vanilla state.
> > > >
> > > > Bug is filed.
> > > >
> > > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152675
> > >
> > > With my comment I meant to file against the libnl maintainer in Gentoo
> > > for including a wrongly names tarball :-)
> >
> > Sorry.
> >
> > I'll let a Gentoo user file that bug since I'm not using that flavor of
> > Linux.
> > --
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > kde-networkmanager mailing list
> > kde-networkmanager at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-networkmanager
> >
>
>
>
> --
> dott. ing. beso




-- 
dott. ing. beso
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-networkmanager/attachments/20071122/1e1fbe9f/attachment.html