Webcams, eye-candy and Phonon
Michael Donaghy
md401 at cam.ac.uk
Thu Apr 27 18:14:41 BST 2006
On Thursday 27 April 2006 17:00, Arc Riley wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:52:32PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > Otherwise, prehaps a "video processing" API is
> > > needed which allows both free and proprietary effects to be achived
> > > through a standalone executable communicating through a unix pipe/etc.
> >
> > Why not through a plugin API ?
>
> Because a plugin is loaded into the codespace of the parent program, and
> could be considered to violate the license of that parent program
> depending on which one you use.
>
> If you're working with a LGPL/GPL framework, contact the FSF license
> team before putting too much work into it.
LGPL would allow it and gstreamer IIRC is explicitly LGPL so that you can have
propriety plugins. I bellieve kde libraries are also made lgpl?
> The way linux works with
> proprietary modules is sketchy, even, and I know there's been problems
> with other projects who actually enforce things like this.
>
> Linus is just really lax about plugins and, I believe, ignoring the GPL
> in some violations in order to promote it's useage.
>
Again IIRC, there are specific exceptions for linux to allow binary modules.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 200 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-multimedia/attachments/20060427/e6a8eea7/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
kde-multimedia mailing list
kde-multimedia at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-multimedia
More information about the kde-multimedia
mailing list