welldone. JuK is great.
wheeler at kde.org
Mon Mar 15 17:14:58 GMT 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Monday 15 March 2004 13:24, Caoilte O'Connor wrote:
> actually I tried JuK a couple of days after Rhythmbox, but
> this was for kde 3.1 and it's possible it only _seemed_
> like longer.
Ah -- that explains things. Yes, in JuK 1.95 (which you must have been using
if you were on KDE 3.1) things definitely were slower. However the whole
meta-data backend was rewritten between 1.95 and 2.0 (and to throw another
library into the mix -- JuK used to use id3lib which was slower than TagLib
Stupidity is the basic building block of the universe.
- --Frank Zappa
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the kde-multimedia