KDE 3.2 and aRts

[George Staikos]

How about we don't require arts at all?


On Saturday 15 March 2003 04:49, Matthias Kretz wrote:
> On Friday March 14 2003 18:37, Neil Stevens wrote:
> > I propose that for KDE 3.2 we continue to require only aRts 1.1 or later,
> > rather than require all users and developers to install glib 2.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> Look at it this way: if KDE 3.2 is going to use aRts 1.1 you require all
> users and developers to install glib 2 at least once (the internal copy
> inside of aRts itself) or twice (for all of those using glib somewhere
> else).
>
> The last change fixes it so that everybody only needs one copy. I'm happy
> for that!
>
> So I propose to use the aRts that's in HEAD.

-- 

George Staikos