[PATCH] KPlayObject fixes for asynchronous generation + patch for kaboodle
matze at stud.fbi.fh-darmstadt.de
Mon Sep 2 18:42:39 BST 2002
On Monday 02 September 2002 00:13, Neil Stevens wrote:
> I just realized this can't go into KPlayObject, because it will break
> compatibility just as severely as if you'd broken binary compatibility.
> Look at it this way: if Kaboodle *can't* work unmodified, then no other app
> that uses KPlayObject can, either.
Yes, I see this, too. I originally planned to get it working as a drop-in
replacement, but I see now that it's not possible. And even if kaboodle
worked unmodified, I cannot promise that any hypothetical application out in
the wild will work.
So, I'll implement a new Class. However, I'm reluctant to calling it
"KPlayObjectV2" or something like this. How are peoples feelings about
namespaces? I remember there were thoughts about moving most "K" classes into
a "KDE" namespace with KDE4, so what about calling the new class
"KDE::PlayObject", and the Factory "KDE::PlayObjectFactory"?
Is there any possibility to versionate symbols in a C++ class library?
Fachschaft Informatik FH Darmstadt
Email: matze at stud.fbi.fh-darmstadt.de
"all software sucks equally, but some software is more equal"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
More information about the kde-multimedia