[KDE/Mac] QStandardPaths possible solution
Jeremy Whiting
jpwhiting at kde.org
Wed Jan 7 13:08:12 UTC 2015
Ok I got this qt built with dbus at last, and almost all frameworks build
against it now with XDG_DATA_DIRS set (to /usr/local/share since I'm
building with kdesrc-build) And it seems to fix the issues of finding data
files from the /usr/local/share location fine. I ran kanagram with it and
it finds it's vocabulary files fine, etc. I guess the next step is
submitting this to gerrit? Does this patch look ok to everyone here? If you
see anything I should change speak up now, otherwise I'll post it to gerrit
tomorrow.
thanks,
Jeremy
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Jeremy Whiting <jpwhiting at kde.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 5:41 AM, René J.V. <rjvbertin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday January 06 2015 05:20:07 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
>>
>> > Yep, I noticed that in the sources also. Separate patches makes sense to
>> > me, but I don't think patches to 5.3 (or 5.4 for that matter) will make
>> it
>> > upstream since those are frozen. We can keep those in
>>
>> Really? 5.4 will remain at 5.4.0 which was release about one (1) month
>> ago?! Is it such a bad release, or has the Qt Company become so good that
>> they can skip the patchlevel releases? I presume that 5.4 and 5.5 are ABI
>> incompatible as to be expected, no?
>>
>
> No there will be 5.4.1 and such, but I think those are only for bug fixes,
> not new features. I'm not sure if this change qualifies as a bug fix or
> not. I would think not, but I could be wrong.
>
>
>>
>> > macports/homebrew/fink packages of qt 5.3 and 5.4 though I suppose.
>>
>> Of course ... what other choice do we have?
>>
>
> Yep.
>
>
>>
>> R.
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-mac/attachments/20150107/83a63ebe/attachment.html>
More information about the kde-mac
mailing list