[KDE/Mac] Kate / KDevelop Sprint
René JV Bertin
rjvbertin at gmail.com
Sun Nov 23 13:04:19 UTC 2014
Agreed. My biggest gripe with Kate is its incapacity to redefine the set of shortcuts easily to conform to platform standards.
And its internal fixed length line buffer that often gets me a warning about lines being cut off.
R
On 22 Nov 2014, at 23:39, Andrew Udvare <audvare at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2014-11-22, at 07:50, John Layt <jlayt at kde.org> wrote:
>> I really can't emphasise enough how good an idea this is. As someone
>> who spends a lot of time on Windows and Mac machines I know how poor
>> the alternative text editors are and how much I miss Kate when I can't
>> install it. We could win many Win/Mac developers as users if we had an
>> easy to deploy package on both platforms, and it would be a good
>> 'gateway drug' to them making use of KF5 in their own code. Having a
>> small targeted goal like deploying Kate would be also give the Win and
>> Mac teams clear achievable goals to work towards in getting KF5 ready
>> with active feedback from the Kate community.
>
> I agree on both points. Both Mac and Windows lack a simple installer, and in reality sometimes all I want on OS X is Kate (a proper KDevelop would be nice too).
>
> I use Kate on OS X almost daily building out of MacPorts. Most issues seem to be related to OS integration and retina (high DPI) support. Isn't this a thing with KDE on other platforms as a whole? This would not only fix Mac, but it would also fix how KDE functions on a high DPI screen (on other platforms besides OS X).
>
> Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> kde-mac at kde.org
> List Information: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-mac
> KDE/Mac Information: http://community.kde.org/Mac
More information about the kde-mac
mailing list