[KDE/Mac] Review Request 121586: Restore upload functionality to git.reviewboard.kde.org
René J.V. Bertin
rjvbertin at gmail.com
Fri Dec 19 17:40:16 UTC 2014
> On Dec. 19, 2014, 1:32 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > plugins/git/gitplugin.h, line 153
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121586/diff/3/?file=333848#file333848line153>
> >
> > remove the const and the default value.
> >
> > Also why adding a setter and a getter for something is never changed? Just make it always --no-prefix, that's fine.
>
> René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Is there anything wrong with the const and default value here?
>
> As to your question: I think it's a good idea to support both kind of patches. KDE's git reviewboard now requires p1 patches, but other reviewboard sites might not.
> I think it'd be beyond the scope of this RR to introduce a UI to select the kind of patch to generate or even make it a feature in the .reviewboardrc settings.
> But adding the getter and setter should make it easier to find the place where to start if and when it turns out that such a control is required. I know how long it can take simply finding the classes to change (jumping between a debugger, a kdevelop session and a kdevelop test session) ...
>
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> The const doesn't add anything. The default value is weird because then you can do setUsePrefix() and reading that takes guess-work to understand what it does, so it's better to just write what you wanted.
>
> I wouldn't support both kinds, --no-prefix was added just as a workaround because komparediff2 didn't support without. Also if we eventually decided we want to add UI to make it configurable, then we can add the property to configure.
> then you can do setUsePrefix() and reading that takes guess-work to understand what it does
Actually, my understanding of the English language is that setUsePrefix() implies that you set things to use a prefix, i.e. setUsePrefix() and setUsePrefix(true) are synonymous. But I don't have any issues removing the default value ;)
- René J.V.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121586/#review72279
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Dec. 18, 2014, 10:59 p.m., René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121586/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Dec. 18, 2014, 10:59 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Software on Mac OS X and KDevelop.
>
>
> Repository: kdevplatform
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> A change was made on git.reviewboard.kde.org on December 13th a bit before 22h Europe/Paris time, ending support for p0 patch files. This broke the upload functionality in the current/stable version KDevelop's patchreview plugin.
>
> The patch under review is a workaround (`*`) that restores this functionality by invoking the git helper process which generates the patchfiles with the correct arguments.
>
> `*`) The real bug is in the reviewboard software, and should be addressed at that level. I work with a software distribution system that requires p0 patches, for which I created patches with KDevelop, something which will now require an additional step.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> plugins/reviewboard/reviewboardjobs.cpp 007a6e0
> plugins/reviewboard/reviewboardplugin.cpp 1dd3bcb
> vcs/vcsdiff.h 573ec1b
> vcs/vcsdiff.cpp 01eb73c
> vcs/widgets/vcsdiffpatchsources.h 6a2f934
> vcs/widgets/vcsdiffpatchsources.cpp c3e2dae
> plugins/git/gitplugin.h e930423
> plugins/git/gitplugin.cpp f38dc71
> plugins/patchreview/patchreview.cpp 18b63db
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121586/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Under OS X 10.9; this RR has been created from a patched copy of KDevelop 4.7 .
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> René J.V. Bertin
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-mac/attachments/20141219/99d247a1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the kde-mac
mailing list