[kde-linux] Am I Alone?
cannewilson at googlemail.com
Tue Sep 29 18:06:13 UTC 2009
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 18:13:05 David Baron wrote:
> KDE4 works fine for me, BUT ...
David, you don't tell us which distro and which KDE version. There's a lot of
difference between 4.2 and 4.3, so we need to know.
> If one is using several plasmoids, desktops, etc., startup is
The only part I've found to be slow is network startup. Could that be your
problem? Also, when I had an fstab entry to a remote drive that wasn't always
available that was a huge problem. Now I have it commented out and only
enable it when needed.
> Startup status is not stable--desktops can be reordered
That is not normal. However, if I tie activities to desktops, then I do see
it. I've disabled that, for that very reason.
> and that trashcan is always mis-sized and mis-placed until I unlock widgets
> and mouse the curser near it, then voile.
Never seen that.
> Sometimes kmix and kxkb appear on
> the panel, sometimes not (must be restarted).
Never seen that either, but networkmanager did occasionally jump out of the
system tray onto the desktop. The new knetworkmanage seems more stable, but
time will tell.
> My wife does none of this fancy stuff, comes up lickitysplit, OK every
> time. Tells you something.
Yes, very often problems are caused by either desktop effects or dodgy
plasmoids. It's a matter of trial and error to tie them down - particularly
since what causes a problem on one system doesn't on another. As an example,
when yawp came out I saw lots and lots of complaints that it was unstable and
caused many problems. I installed it on this laptop at the time, and I've
never had any problems with it whatsoever. Obviously, whatever upset it
wasn't relevant on this laptop. FWIW, the complaints seem to have stopped - I
assume an update has fixed the problem.
> Konqueror? I haven't touched in in ages. Simply was too messed up to bother
> with. Opera, Google-chrome, and firefox are much much better. Liking google
> more and more.
> Kmail? After a shakey start in early KDE4, works quite nicely. Crashes are
> very rare now. No complaints as long as network is duely connected.
> Plasma is gett
> ing better and better and only the surface of it potential
> has been touched. One can revert to the older schema if one desires and
> keep applets on the panel or on dashboards. Very flexible, or will be.
> KDE3 is a dead end. Since I compiled that starting when one could not
> update it from Debian Sid, I have both 3.5.6 and 4.3. Can use 3 if 4 gets
> really mussed but this has not happened in ages. My daughter still runs
> 3.5.6 because the kaboom did not work on her login. I'll get to fixing it
> up but no rush.
> My only real complaint now is the 3.5.6--most everything in it--is much
> quicker (on my PIII 600mhz clunker with an old matrox card so maybe don't
> blame KDE4 and progress!).
Yup - the new Xorg doesn't like these older cards. What's more, we still have
quite a lot of problems with other display cards. It's a driver issue, and
all the main players in the field are working on it. This is yet another case
where we just have to be patient, but should end up with something far better
than the old stuff, and I don't suppose there is any possibility of saying how
long it will take.
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the kde-linux