[Kde-java] Re: GCJ (Re: Build system for KDE4)

[Thomas Zander]

On Sunday 19 June 2005 22:35, Richard Dale wrote:
[snip signal/slot discussion]
>  On the other hand, I think it's useful to
> have an option close to the C++ api to make it easy to convert code
> from C++ to java.

Realistically; how many people will do that?
But ok, if the implementation is there, we can use it. No need to throw 
work away.
I assume the example code you typed uses a base object QObject?  Or how 
does an object know the SLOT method in your Java example?

> But if you were starting from scratch, you might want 
> to use the version based on your design if it looked better. As long as
> the implementation underneath is the same and compatible.

Naturally.
-- 
Thomas Zander
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-java/attachments/20050620/f3b60080/attachment.pgp