[Kde-imaging] Digikam raw processing result different from libraw with input icc profile

[Gilles Caulier]

In digiKam, are you sure that all post processing settings are
disabled to compare results between digiKam and libraw. ?

Postprocessing are digiKam only settings. Libraw do not have it.

Gilles Caulier

2010/8/12 Jerome MARTY <jmy at laposte.net>:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have troubles having the same result when importing RAW files in
> digikam when specifying an input profile than when using LibRaw's
> dcraw_emu test tool with same options. The result of the raw file import
> in digikam is the same with no input profile but too much bright when
> specifying one.
> I am testing against digikam svn version with debugging enabled in order
> to check options passed to libraw. The settings I'm using in digikam
> taken from debug output are :
> digikam(689)/KDCRAW KDcrawIface::KDcraw::loadFromLibraw: LibRaw: dcraw
> emulation:  ("-W", "-4", "-h", "-H 0", "-r 1.86809 0.938161 0.94545
> 0.938161", "-q 3", "-p /home/jer/.iccprofiles/pen10.icm", "-o 1",
> "/home/jer/Pictures/test/IMGP2949.PEF")
>
> I'm checking against this:
> /mnt/tmp/digikam/kdegraphics/libs/libkdcraw/build/test/dcraw_emu -v -W
> -4 -h -H 0 -r 1.86809 0.938161 0.94545 0.938161 -q 3 -p
> ~/.iccprofiles/pen10.icm -o 1 -T IMGP2949.PEF
>
>
> Am I doing or interpreting something wrong ?
>
> I can provide samples to help and did some debug myself but did not
> manage to pinpoint the origin of the problem.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jerome
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-imaging mailing list
> Kde-imaging at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-imaging
>