[Kde-imaging] Discussing the future of kipi and kipi-plugins

[Angelo Naselli]

Alle 15:41, domenica 29 gennaio 2006, Tom Albers ha scritto:
> Op zondag 29 januari 2006 12:13, schreef Caulier Gilles:
> > Le Dimanche 29 Janvier 2006 11:54, Joern Ahrens a écrit :
> > > On Sunday 29 January 2006 02:39, Tom Albers wrote:
> > > > Tom Albers wrote:
> > > > > What I like to know if any other developer is going to care about the
> > > > > kipi's...
> > > >
> > > > It is freightning to see the silence to this request. If nobody cares
> > > > anymore we can stop this silly situation as far as i care.
> > >
> > > I mailed with Sebastian before he started this thread, so I haven't
> > > answered. But you are right, the silence about this topic shows the
> > > interest of the other projects... I can remember, when Renchi asked about
> > > a release schedule, and nobody answered. Since nobody is interessted
> > > anymore, we can declare the kipi-project collapsed and do the further
> > > work inside digikam. Which saves us time and several problems, coming
> > > with the kipi's, are solved as well (shortcuts, bug reports,
> > > releases,.....)
> >
> > I'm full agree with you Joern. You already know my viewpoint about kipi and
> > others projects witch uses plugins (outside digikam of course).
> 
> Ok, lets pull the plug then. We need to think about how to move the kipi's 
> back to digiKam. I suppose we can do that best at digikam-devel.
> 
> toma
> 
I don't like this solution, but if no one tells that he's not agree... 
I will say my last comment then, as a user i probably don't know kipi/kipi-plugins 
are plugins of my preferred image viewer (let's say gwenview), so i cannot understand
what you're going to decide. What i see is i won't have my features any more... 
that's bad IMO (even if digikam-devel could solve the problem for developers). 
As a packager it means who care about digikam package will have to manage some 
confilicts.
As a developer, which I'm in life not in this project, it is very sad to see
how a great idea and job is failing....

Maybe a day we could meet again in digkam mailing list then... maybe not

Angelo

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-imaging/attachments/20060129/42d0ec81/attachment.pgp