[Kde-imaging] Objections?

[Tom Albers]

Maciek Borowka schreef:
> Hello,
> 
> 1. No, KDEPIM dependency is not checked during the compile time. I don't know 
> what to add and to which file in order to have such a check.
> 
> 2. I am going to use dlopen in order to make the runtime dependency optional. 
> I'll try to do it this weekend.

As I wrote in the bugreport, maybe it is easier to copy over some files from kdepim?

> 3. There are few new strings, indeed :+)
> 
> ./Maciek
> 
> On Tuesday 29 November 2005 00:30, Aurelien Gateau wrote:
> 
>>Le Lundi 28 Novembre 2005 00:11, Tom Albers a écrit :
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Does any object if i review this patch and commit it?
>>>http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116970
>>>I'm asking it because we officially released a release candidate...
>>
>>Sounds nice. I'm just a bit worried about the kdepim dependency. I haven't
>>had time to check the patch. Does it include a ./configure check for its
>>availability? I guess it also introduce a few strings. Is there any kind of
>>string freeze running for kipi-plugins?
>>
>>Aurélien
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Kde-imaging mailing list
>>Kde-imaging at kde.org
>>https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-imaging
> 
>