Migrating Pology to Python 3

[Adrian Chaves]

Most likely I messed up while trying to clean up the patch, will look 
into it.

On 2022-10-08 14:41, Karl Ove Hufthammer wrote:

> Adrian Chaves skreiv 04.10.2022 12:49:
> 
>> So I would like every Pology user to test as soon as possible their 
>> usual workflows with pology with the python3 branch, and report to me 
>> any issue. I do expect there to be issues. So send me a command to 
>> reproduce the issue you get, and I will fix it.
> I found some changes in the rules triggered by 'posieve check-rules'. 
> But it turned out that this was because the Python 3 branch doesn't 
> include some recent changes in the rulesets (not very recent - 
> committed in July and August this year). Is this intentional? Example 
> of differences:
> 
> git diff master..python3 lang/nn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-i18n-doc/attachments/20221008/ff61749b/attachment.htm>