[Kde-hardware-devel] Review Request 107257: Handle unsupported actions quietly

Oliver Henshaw oliver.henshaw at gmail.com
Fri May 17 13:44:03 UTC 2013



> On May 5, 2013, 10:36 p.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > Ping?
> 
> Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
>     Wednesday is Feature Freeze for 4.11!

Still neglecting this in favour of nominally more important things. It's already on the feature list, so the relevant deadline is the Hard Feature Freeze (5th June). Besides I think that the majority of this is suitable for 4.10.x, so I mean to get it in before 4.10.4 tagging (May 30th).


- Oliver


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107257/#review32113
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 21, 2012, 7:20 p.m., Oliver Henshaw wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107257/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 21, 2012, 7:20 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Solid.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Handle unsupported actions quietly
> 
> Attempting to load a configured action on a machine where it is not
> supported (e.g. DPMS when the display doesn't support it or it is not
> compiled in) fails and brings up a notification, something that is
> particularly intrusive during login.
> 
> Provide a method for ActionPool::loadAction callers to ask why the load
> failed. PowerDevil::Core::loadProfile uses this check to decide whether
> to warn to stderr rather than notifying the user of a misconfiguration.
> Other loadAction callers are unchanged.
> 
> Action loading failure may be due to an error during initialisation or
> simply because no such action exits. In the former case the error must
> be recorded so that it is available to pass on to later loadAction
> callers.
> 
> NB: A more complete fix might involve detecting whether the action is
> supportable when loading the action configuration and/or in the profile
> generator. However that may not turn out to be a feasible approach.
> 
> BUG: 302846
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   powerdevil/daemon/powerdevilactionpool.h 8a94eacc8ef2c2aead8cb075cbc80b783c1aeb4c 
>   powerdevil/daemon/powerdevilactionpool.cpp a9950f174fe184b8faa54c54fc00654984c65b3f 
>   powerdevil/daemon/powerdevilcore.cpp 2dcdbc62236d5c1fae384fdb9111825a2ebf5204 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107257/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested in VM with cirrus/vnc (dpms) and qxl/spice (non-dpms) graphics. Tested the NoAction and LoadFailed cases act as expected. Tested nothing horrible happens when disabling and re-enabling powerdevil in kded Services Manager.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Oliver Henshaw
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-hardware-devel/attachments/20130517/f88f08fc/attachment.html>


More information about the Kde-hardware-devel mailing list