[Kde-hardware-devel] Review Request 107698: Keep watching service until last inhibition goes

[Dario Freddi]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107698/#review26380
-----------------------------------------------------------



powerdevil/daemon/powerdevilpolicyagent.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107698/#comment20096>

    I wouldn't use key() for that, as there is no guarantee AFAIK that if not found, it would return 0 (it usually returns a default constructed key, which in case of an int could be pretty much any value.).
    
    As such, I either propose .key(service, 0), which guarantees the returned key would be 0 if not existent; or .values().contains(service). I'd choose the second for clarity.


- Dario Freddi


On Dec. 13, 2012, 12:55 p.m., Oliver Henshaw wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107698/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 13, 2012, 12:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Solid.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Keep watching service until last inhibition goes
> 
> 
> Also contains the commit:
> 
> Remove inhibition with take() for efficiency
> 
> Re-use the returned service QString rather than look it up each time.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   powerdevil/daemon/powerdevilpolicyagent.cpp d688512f0eba1c9d201c32bf5312edbe87af3c78 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107698/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Sanity checked inhibition lifetime with python scripts.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Oliver Henshaw
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-hardware-devel/attachments/20130129/f917f681/attachment.html>