[Kde-hardware-devel] Review Request: Don't set unwanted DPMS timeouts on inhibition change

[Commit Hook]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106793/#review21304
-----------------------------------------------------------


This review has been submitted with commit 7626961a799e03af8907711ac304b4428208dece by Oliver Henshaw to branch push/4.9.

- Commit Hook


On Oct. 12, 2012, 5:45 p.m., Oliver Henshaw wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106793/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 12, 2012, 5:45 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Solid.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Don't set unwanted DPMS timeouts on inhibition change
> 
> Set m_idleTime to zero when action first initialised and when unloaded.
> This makes onProfileLoad safe to use by onUnavailablePoliciesChanged
> even when the action is not loaded.
> 
> CCBUG: 295164
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   powerdevil/daemon/actions/dpms/powerdevildpmsaction.cpp a16bf7ee254b9a40c6f033c93e5ca63226469e6e 
>   powerdevil/daemon/actions/dpms/powerdevildpmsaction.h ef734c47cef79fbc5573ec3683c30e415bbc8a2e 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106793/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Checking 'xset -q' after add/remove inhibition from battery applet in two cases: after login when screen power saving is not enabled; after changing screen power saving configuration from enabled to disabled.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Oliver Henshaw
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-hardware-devel/attachments/20121101/c3cde7e3/attachment-0001.html>