[Kde-hardware-devel] Solid device action predicates

[Ozan Çağlayan]

Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Urgh! I'm not quite fan of the "e+1", it'll obviously break if the behavior 
> changes and that we get -2 for instance, and moreover it's kind of a magic 
> value in this context.
>
> Anyway I committed a proper fix just now[*] which checks the return value of 
> keysToValue (aka the place where the error occurs) to reset the expected value 
> to an invalid in this case.
>
> Note that I'm committing this with the accompanying unit tests. That generally 
> makes it faster to debug something when you use those. ;-)
>
> Regards.
> [*] Revision 1001864 in trunk, backported as revision 1001868 in 4.3.
>   
Thanks!