[Kde-hardware-devel] Using a bitmask for device types

[Kevin Ottens]

Le Mercredi 11 Janvier 2006 12:03, Christopher Blauvelt a écrit :
> Any thoughts?

It's in the plan to move away from string based capabilities (you might have 
noticed some "FIXME" in the comments ;-) ).

But from what you wrote it looks like you're proposing to use some 
"#define" (note that I'm guessing here). It would be better to use an enum 
type and an associated QFlags type. This way we'll be able to have the kind 
of notation you introduced, but we'll also be able to make stricter type 
checking.

Regards.
--
Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
"Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître,
Ne font reculer l'ignorance."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-hardware-devel/attachments/20060111/5b16fde7/attachment.pgp