[kde-guidelines] Styleguide: Vision

Thomas Pfeiffer colomar at autistici.org
Tue Jan 28 21:40:38 UTC 2014


On Tuesday 28 January 2014 22:32:39 Heiko Tietze wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 January 2014, 21:25:53 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > > == Best Practice ==
> > > * Consider the
> > > [http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/Usability/Principles/KDE4_Vision| KDE
> > > vision] in your project.
> > 
> > Same as the other two ;)
> > An example would be very helpful here as well. Maybe we should pick an
> > application we work closely with (KTp?), create a vision with them and
> > then
> > include it here?
> 
> http://community.kde.org/KTp/Usability#Vision
> 
> I like this series of articles:
> http://grundleborg.wordpress.com/2011/04/01/the-vision-of-kde-telepathy-part
> -1-%E2%80%93-the-problem/
> 
> But is KTp really a prototypical project?

I don't know what would make a "prototypical KDE project", but I don't think 
KTp's vision would be fundamentally different from other projects' visions. 
They offer benefits to certain users with certain tasks in certain situations.

> > > [[Category:Usability]][[Category:Structure]][[Category:Task_Flow]]
> > > 
> > > As for persona: Should we absorb the old vision page? And by the way,
> > > the
> > > vision seems to be outdated: "KDE4, the next major version of the K
> > > Desktop
> > > Environment...".
> > 
> > It is outdated indeed, given that the KDE4 era is pretty much in
> > maintenance mode / on its deathbed. I'll write an email to the KDE
> > community mailing list asking if we should update the vision or create an
> > entirely new one for the next generation.
> 
> The bullet points are still valid, I guess. ;-)

I think so, too, but I'd like to make sure that the community still identifies 
with that vision today since we link to it from the HIG.



More information about the kde-guidelines mailing list