[kde-guidelines] CVS - Attempt to summarise

[Frans Englich]

On Saturday 06 November 2004 13:57, Lauri Watts wrote:
> On Saturday 06 November 2004 14:44, Frans Englich wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 November 2004 12:50, Lauri Watts wrote:
> > > On Thursday 04 November 2004 13:08, Frans Englich wrote:
> >
> > Right, first 5.0(it can be a good idea to plan such that we avoid
> > shooting ourself in the foot). You're not going to argue against the
> > Docbook Working Group choice of section, and say that sectX actually are
> > better? :) I mean, I already have a fulltime job of bringing forward
> > W3C's Xincludes(ka dum dum bing).
>
> I frankly have no intention of arguing with you about anything.

I'm not following, you mean that we haven't argued/discussed Xincludes vs 
System entities? Or that you won't discuss template design, such as section 
vs sectX?


Cheers,

		Frans