[Kde-games-devel] Possible GSoC project
Guy Van den Broeck
guyvdb at gmail.com
Mon Mar 24 19:54:10 CET 2008
Thanks for the feedback.
Ressurecting KPoker is not really an option for me. Looking at the
screenshots I think CSPoker is already more advanced than KPoker. I'm also
very familiar with the CSPoker codebase which would give the project better
chance of success.
How well supported is Java (6) in KDE?
I'm leaving for a 2 week road trip tomorrow morning so I'd have to write up
a proposal quickly.
Cheers,
Guy
2008/3/24, Mauricio Piacentini <piacentini at kde.org>:
>
> Eugene Trounev wrote:
> > Yes, all is well, but Andy may be, or may not be interested, on the
> other hand
> > here we have people who are ready and willing to do it. Why turn donwn a
> > perfectly good offer? However, I do agree that we should contact Andy
> first.
>
>
> Sure. But look carefully at my text: I was mainly answering to your
>
> question if he had a poker game before or not. And I also said:
>
> >> year, so it will probably come back eventually. Not that this prevents
> >> other poker games from getting in
>
>
> See? So, let me be clear: nothing against a new poker game, if there is
> someone wanting to develop it in playground. In some cases it can
> actually be easier to start fresh, I know. But I still think that
> eventual resources coming from SoC should probably be directed to
> improving existing apps/libraries/frameworks. This is only my personal
> opinion, but I have seen similar messages in other lists.
>
>
> Regards,
> Mauricio Piacentini
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kde-games-devel mailing list
> kde-games-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-games-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-games-devel/attachments/20080324/5da8654c/attachment.html
More information about the kde-games-devel
mailing list