[Bug 226611] KDE4_GENERIC_LIB_VERSION set to expected, not factual

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226611

--- Comment #12 from Mikhail Teterin <mi at FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Adriaan de Groot from comment #9)
> I'd appreciate it if arguments over policies and procedures could happen outside a particular bug.
...
(As well as in reply to Mark Linimon from comment #10)
> I have always tried to take this same approach with the PR database

Then both of you should've spoken to mat@, when he posted his claims. Once he
did, I had no other choice but to challenge them, for they are obviously bogus
-- even if it was not polite of me to point that out.

> tcberner@ in comment 3 has already said "open to patches", but it's fairly -- really

He did say that, but then a portmgr-member came out claiming this nonexistent
policy. And, given that portmgr officially owns everything under Mk/, there is
no point working up a patch while that body insists, things work as intended --
and thus, any patch will be rejected.

It would be nice, if someone else from portmgr stated, that a proper patch
will, indeed, be accepted once uploaded -- even if a proper repudiation of
their colleague's bogus claims is too much to expect.

> using "Not enough information"

The amount of information supplied is perfectly sufficient -- everybody
understands, what the problem is and how to reproduce it.

> because there doesn't seem to be a patch

Respectfully, that's not a good reason to close a PR...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.