libkscreen without wayland backend and doctor.

[Tobias C. Berner]

Thanks bapt.



On 25 January 2017 at 00:52, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 01:49:32PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:06:12 +0100 "Tobias C. Berner" <
> tcberner at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > On 23 January 2017 at 13:01, Tijl Coosemans <tijl at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 21:44:59 +0100 "Tobias C. Berner"
> > >> <tcberner at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > >>> On 22 January 2017 at 16:46, Tijl Coosemans <tijl at freebsd.org>
> wrote:
> > >>>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 21:40:48 +0100 "Tobias C. Berner"
> > >>>> <tcberner at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > >>>>> On 19 January 2017 at 17:13, Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen
> > >>>>> <jesper at schmitz.computer> wrote:
> > >>>>>> I've been working a little on LXQt (https://wiki.freebsd.org/LXQt
> )
> > >>>>>> LXQt only misses plasma5-libkscreen in the offical portstree to
> > >>>>>> build in the offical portstree.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Therefore I patched plasma5-libkscreen [1] to build without
> wayland,
> > >>>>>> e.g commenting out the wayland specific parts in CMakeLists and by
> > >>>>>> skipping the "doctor" subdir. It builds and work with lxqt-config.
> > >>>>>> Just want to know if there is an interest to have
> lib/libKF5Screen.so
> > >>>>>> in the offical tree without wayland support?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 1 http://lxqt-freebsd.schmitz.computer/ \
> > >>>>>> plasma5-libkscreen-port-without-wayland.tar.gz
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I added a slightly modified version of your idea to the plasma5
> branch
> > >>>>> in r13609.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I'm not quite sure if it is ideal to have just "bits" of plasma5
> in the
> > >>>>> ports tree, when we cannot provide the whole desktop -- which we
> can't
> > >>>>> until wayland is in... But we should maybe think about it ^^
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If libkscreen is the only thing blocking LXQt it should definitely
> be
> > >>>> added to the tree.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Wayland on FreeBSD is still several months away I think so how
> critical
> > >>>> is it for plasma5?  Surely it should work with a pure X11 system?
> > >>>
> > >>> plasma5 requires graphics/wayland [1] from [2] for the screenlocker
> > >>> component for example -- even for X11 based sessions [3]. (So by the
> same
> > >>> argument we could/should/have request[ed] graphics/wayland to be
> added to
> > >>> the ports tree :P -- wayland may be months out, but that port has
> been
> > >>> used for nearly two years now in the plasma5 branch).
> > >>>
> > >>> I'll create a diff for a patched plasma5-libkscreen for the ports
> tree.
> > >>
> > >> Is the graphics/wayland port the only thing you need?  Because that
> looks
> > >> like a very simple component.  It should definitely be added to the
> tree
> > >> if that's the only thing blocking plasma5, and then you don't need
> this
> > >> libkscreen hack.
> > >
> > > yes :) -- I don't think we imported anything else into our plasma5
> branch.
> >
> > Bapt, can you look into (and commit) graphics/wayland?  It's the only
> > thing blocking KDE5.
>
> It is in (actually it is in x11-servers/wayland :)) (yeah weird to have it
> in
> x11-servers but hey :D
>
> Bapt
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-freebsd/attachments/20170126/e840e9f1/attachment-0001.html>