[Bug 218404] x11-toolkits/qt5-widgets complains about duplicate symbols in libQt5Core.so

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218404

            Bug ID: 218404
           Summary: x11-toolkits/qt5-widgets complains about duplicate
                    symbols in libQt5Core.so
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: kde at FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: Trond.Endrestol at ximalas.info
          Assignee: kde at FreeBSD.org
             Flags: maintainer-feedback?(kde at FreeBSD.org)

Created attachment 181516
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=181516&action=edit
Complete build log

Complete build log is attached.
To summarize:

System is stable/11 amd64 at r316491, thus the system compiler is FreeBSD's
clang 4.0.0. Ports tree is at r437806.

x11-toolkits/qt5-widgets complains about duplicate symbols in libQt5Core.so:

/usr/ports/workdirs/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt5-widgets/work/qtbase-opensource-src-5.7.1/lib/libQt5Core.so:(.dynamic+0x27ad8):
multiple definition of `__bss_start at Qt_5'
/usr/ports/workdirs/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt5-widgets/work/qtbase-opensource-src-5.7.1/lib/libQt5Core.so:(.dynamic+0x27ad8):
first defined here
/usr/ports/workdirs/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt5-widgets/work/qtbase-opensource-src-5.7.1/lib/libQt5Core.so:(.dynamic+0x27ad8):
multiple definition of `_edata at Qt_5'
/usr/ports/workdirs/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt5-widgets/work/qtbase-opensource-src-5.7.1/lib/libQt5Core.so:(.dynamic+0x27ad8):
first defined here
/usr/ports/workdirs/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt5-widgets/work/qtbase-opensource-src-5.7.1/lib/libQt5Core.so:(.dynamic+0x2b2d0):
multiple definition of `_end at Qt_5'

Note, the linker is referring to a library from within the work directory, not
the library installed in /usr/local/lib/qt5 by devel/qt5-core. Maybe that's the
real problem.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.