[kde-freebsd] [PATCH] CLucene 0.9.x -> 2.3.x

[Jung-uk Kim]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2013-01-16 01:42:15 -0500, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 07:20:37PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> On 2013-01-15 10:05:01 -0500, Max Brazhnikov wrote:
>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:41:02 -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>>>> LibreOffice 3.6 and later requires CLucene 2.3 but we have
>>>> 0.9.x in the source tree.  I'd like to import it now before
>>>> we start working on LO.  Please see attached clucene2.diff.
>>>> 
>>>> Changes: - Upgrade CLucene 0.9.21 to the last stable version,
>>>> i. e., 0.9.21b. - Import CLucene 2.3.3.4.  It is required by 
>>>> LibreOffice 3.6 and later. - Register conflicts between 0.9.x
>>>> and 2.3.x.
>>>> 
>>>> Please review the attached patch.
>>> 
>>> I see no reason to keep old clucene, it's unmaintained
>>> upstream. I'd deprecated textproc/p5-Lucene and updated
>>> textproc/clucene directly to 2.x.
>> 
>> Although I agree with you in general, we can't just set it
>> BROKEN without the maintainers' consent, can we?  (FYI,
>> textproc/p5-Lucene is maintained by perl@).
>> 
> 
> First yes we can, if there is really no other choice, secondly
> given that nothing depends on it, I approve the BROKEN.

Okay.  If clsung and tj agree, then we can upgrade clucene and remove
clucene-contrib.  Who's going to be the maintainer, then?

> regards, Bapt with perl@ hat :)

Ah, I forgot that you have many many hats in your closet. ;-)

JK
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ9viKAAoJECXpabHZMqHOwEEH/i8Tuu1J3pvNxrBONtVYVfW+
CrzZNZDuYhCXlGiX4AjBHQV5iswA1VfmwBTgq+OvJMSWTkgbKUziCL2CdQRfTKrH
gFJwtgbidzMr+eMyN5uTl+w6wKWcfIgDUC57Y93/CNQ8MZS96BdYSpXF2FDkcw4G
a40PSOaK3q7Xkn0u8TDAhswf07sbQsJEeBEQYvPAXq/u3XU5nzLSp0t/4lnPtli5
akUMB6B0sWbVpMNffzZ2sY1+Nh2JVwENA7iFlfPG4sGwVAzC1WNDAeYBDZeifRsh
TsUuh05LpUGkulPMERaK/C/KZu5dVbjKDvpxtHrwyOjEPeaRae4wVQ0n4MgjbSc=
=k2G6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----