[kde-freebsd] QFilesSystemWatcher instead of polling/FAM

Tijl Coosemans tijl at coosemans.org
Sun Sep 19 23:03:32 CEST 2010

On Sunday 19 September 2010 20:10:48 Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:52:03 +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Sunday 19 September 2010 07:51:43 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
>>> If everything is working fine with the patch, wouldn't it be nice to
>>> upstream it? I remember Tijl sent a merge request for the Qt part
>>> (how is it going, by the way?), but I haven't seen the KDE part being
>>> sent yet :)
>> Progress on the Qt part is slow. My patch exposed a bug in the qfsw
>> unit test and fixing that exposed bugs in another qfsw backend. Every
>> time I update my patch it takes several weeks to get a Qt developer to
>> look at it, because this isn't exactly a high profile part of Qt and
>> they're busy getting 4.7 out.
>> I haven't submitted the KDE part yet, because it doesn't work without
>> the Qt part.
> We can commit the patches to ports and wait until they will be merged 
> upstream.

That's ok for me. I'll be here to help if more problems do turn up.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-freebsd/attachments/20100919/88c1bd5d/attachment.sig 

More information about the kde-freebsd mailing list