KDE Frameworks with failing CI (master) (11 May 2025)

[Nicolas Fella]

Am 13.05.25 um 17:22 schrieb Volker Krause:
> On Montag, 12. Mai 2025 11:26:41 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Sune Vuorela
> wrote:
>> On 2025-05-11, Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:
>>> Please work on fixing them, otherwise I will remove the failing CI jobs on
>>> their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for
>>> multiple reasons.
>>>
>>> Bad news: 1 repository is still failing
>>>
>>> krunner - 2ND WEEK
>>>
>>>   * https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/krunner/-/pipelines/944055
>>>   
>>>    * reuse fails
>> https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/krunner/-/commit/55d6f117fc9279e202ce08ed5
>> b73c64ea3f261ae
>>
>> It is this one pushed without CI that broke it.
>> It is not hard to fix is one knows how Nicolas intends to license those
>> files?
> And as said on Matrix already, this isn't limited to KRunner, we'd ideally get
> the missing SPDX markers added to the qdoc files in all of KF, as those are
> likely going to be copy/pasted to more repos (including REUSE-compliant ones).

That raises the question of what license do we want them to have?

Our Licensing Policy says "Documentation must be licensed under the 
CC-BY-SA-4.0 or compatible licence". Does a qdocconf file qualify as 
documentation (it only contains configuration, no actual documentation 
words)? Probably close enough.