Re KIO workers

[Kevin Ottens]

Hello,

On Saturday, 5 June 2021 22:01:54 CEST David Faure wrote:
> On samedi 5 juin 2021 21:07:39 CEST Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Saturday, 5 June 2021 17:51:18 CEST David Faure wrote:
> > > On samedi 5 juin 2021 16:29:10 CEST Volker Krause wrote:
> > > > Do KIO slaves still need the klauncher/kinit loading mechanism?
> > > 
> > > No. My request for developers to test KIO_FORK_SLAVES=1
> > > for daily use is so that apps fork kio worker processes directly,
> > > without going via klauncher/kinit. BTW it seems to work fine. I wonder
> > > if we should toggle that in 5.84, as part of the incremental move to the
> > > KF6 world.
> > 
> > Actually it works so well that I almost forgot I turned KIO_FORK_SLAVES
> > on...
> 
> I hope we're both wrong: the env var is *KDE*_FORK_SLAVES :)

I forgot it so well that I got the variable wrong under the influence of your 
email. Yes, I got KDE_FORK_SLAVES enabled... went and check since you gave me 
a doubt. :-D

Cheers.
-- 
Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

enioka Haute Couture - proud patron of KDE, https://hc.enioka.com/en
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20210606/89db07a7/attachment.sig>