Re KIO workers

[Kevin Ottens]

Hello,

On Saturday, 5 June 2021 17:51:18 CEST David Faure wrote:
> On samedi 5 juin 2021 16:29:10 CEST Volker Krause wrote:
> > Do KIO slaves still need the klauncher/kinit loading mechanism?
> 
> No. My request for developers to test KIO_FORK_SLAVES=1
> for daily use is so that apps fork kio worker processes directly, without
> going via klauncher/kinit. BTW it seems to work fine. I wonder if we should
> toggle that in 5.84, as part of the incremental move to the KF6 world.

Actually it works so well that I almost forgot I turned KIO_FORK_SLAVES on...
 
Regards.
-- 
Kevin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

enioka Haute Couture - proud patron of KDE, https://hc.enioka.com/en
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20210605/6367e673/attachment.sig>