D29256: [server] Introduce mapped() signal

[Vlad Zahorodnii]

zzag added inline comments.

INLINE COMMENTS

> apol wrote in surface_interface.cpp:333
> Using != would probably be more readable and accurate (we're don't need it to be bitwise, we're assuming bool changes it to 00001 or 00000).

We can't use != because mapped() will be emitted each time a new buffer is attached to the surface.

REPOSITORY
  R127 KWayland

BRANCH
  introduce-mapped-signal

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D29256

To: zzag, #kwin, davidedmundson
Cc: apol, kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack, michaelh, ngraham, bruns
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20200428/1e008e62/attachment-0001.html>