D21519: Rename ImageMake and ImageModel properties

[Stefan Brüns]

bruns added a comment.


  In D21519#475781 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D21519#475781>, @ngraham wrote:
  
  > In D21519#474885 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D21519#474885>, @astippich wrote:
  >
  > > @ngraham what's your take regarding "Manufacturer" vs. "Equipment Manufacturer"?
  >
  >
  > "Manufacturer" is shorter, but since the metadata is attached to a photo, the longer version might make more sense to cement that it's a property of the camera itself, and not the photo!
  
  
  But is it really ambiguous? If it states "Canon", "EOS 70D" or "Nikon", "D5000 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D5000>", there isn't much room for interpretation. Also, "Equipment" is not really fitting very well - what about the lense, what about the tripod, the flash(es)? And what/who would a "Photo manufacturer" be? We are talking about digital images here.
  
  The more I think about it, the more I dislike the enum renaming - reusing a strange name from some widely used standard is one thing, but inventing a new one I don't consider a good idea.

REPOSITORY
  R286 KFileMetaData

BRANCH
  euqipment_properties

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D21519

To: astippich, ngraham, bruns
Cc: kde-frameworks-devel, #baloo, LeGast00n, domson, ashaposhnikov, michaelh, astippich, spoorun, ngraham, bruns, abrahams
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20190607/2c1f7357/attachment.html>