D25975: Relicense some files to LGPLv2+ or v2v3, OK by all contributors according to relicensecheck.pl

[Christophe Giboudeaux]

cgiboudeaux added inline comments.

INLINE COMMENTS

> dfaure wrote in kservicefactory.cpp:6-7
> The reason is Waldo Bastian, who agreed to 2-or-3 but not to 2+
> 
>   waba (  17 LOC): 7ee6ea605e,ec1dc9339f,307504885e,764b51a72c,f1d9d663e6,010677452e,79787d4962,5dcce58a32,0ef36944f8 
> 
> He did agree to +eV, but others didn't (lunakl, mueller).
> Hmm, on further investigation, the commits from those two were all trivial (typos, includes, fsf address in license header). I'll make it 2-or-3-with-eV-clause then.
> 
> I guess this can then be turned into 2+ by asking the eV, but is that worth the trouble?
> All this is moot without Bernhard Loos anyway.

> I guess this can then be turned into 2+ by asking the eV, but is that worth the trouble?

Nope, The e.V. can't turn 2.0-only to 2.0-or-later. The proxy is only allowed to act on //future versions// of the license

REPOSITORY
  R309 KService

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D25975

To: dfaure, apol, cgiboudeaux
Cc: cgiboudeaux, kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, GB_2, michaelh, ngraham, bruns
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20191214/0ba8b314/attachment-0001.html>