D23344: assert slave command finality
David Faure
noreply at phabricator.kde.org
Sat Aug 24 11:57:43 BST 2019
dfaure added a comment.
I see those warnings often, so I'm a bit worried that this will make kioslaves quite crashy for KDE developers for a while, including those unable to fix those issues.
At least we need to fix known issues first, like kio_ftp.
How about we both (and ZaWertun) run with this for a while (and fix things) before merging it upstream?
Note that we could also just export QT_FATAL_WARNINGS=1 before kdeinit5 :-)
INLINE COMMENTS
> slavebase.cpp:202
> + // Force the command into finished state. We'll not reach this for Debug builds
> + // that fail the assertion. For Releas builds we'll have made sure that the
> + // command is actually finished after the verfication regardless of what
typo: Release
> slavebase.cpp:203
> + // that fail the assertion. For Releas builds we'll have made sure that the
> + // command is actually finished after the verfication regardless of what
> + // the slave did.
typo: verification
> slavebase.cpp:480
> + Q_FUNC_INFO,
> + qUtf8Printable(QStringLiteral("error() was called, but it's not supposed to! Please fix the %2 KIO slave")
> + .arg(QCoreApplication::applicationName())));
should be %1, not %2
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D23344
To: sitter, dfaure
Cc: kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, GB_2, michaelh, ngraham, bruns
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20190824/d9a7e4f7/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list