Quality of Frameworks announcements

[Luigi Toscano]

On Sunday, 9 September 2018 16:07:43 CEST Yuri Chornoivan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I think that several latest Frameworks announcements are not of even medium
> quality. It is hard to translate them because the commit messages list looks
> like some kind of puzzle. 

This is a good point, but the i18n list is not the right place. Redirecting to 
kde-frameworks-devel.

> Examples:
> 
> no need to new/delete hash on each doHighlight, clearing it is good enough
> 
> ensure we can handle invalid attribute indices that can happen as left overs
> after HL switch for a document
> 
> let smart pointer handle deletion of objects, less manual stuff to do
> 
> remove map to lookup additional hl properties
> 
> KTextEditor uses the KSyntaxHighlighting framework for all
> 
> use character encodings as provided by the definitions
> 
> non-bold text no longer renders with font weight thin but (bug 393861)
> 
> footer separator line visually lighter
> 
> make can break bit more like in word code
> 
> no linked list without any reason
> 
> cleanup properties init
> 
> etc.
> 
> There are meaningless to the end-user messages:
> 
> Merge branch 'master' into syntax-highlighting
> 
> Merge branch 'master' into syntax-highlighting (again)
> 
> There are also some workflow things (commit -> revert -> commit again,
> commit (5.49) -> revert (5.50)).
> 
> If announce is some kind of advertisement it can be some kind of meaningful.
> 
> Is it possible to ask developers/release team/marketing team to give us,
> translators, the material that can be retranslated to community on the
> quality that KDE deserves?
> 
> Thanks in advance for your help.
> 
> Best regards,
> Yuri

-- 
Luigi