D17079: Provide a qqc2/kirigami-based about page
Marco Martin
noreply at phabricator.kde.org
Thu Nov 22 16:58:07 GMT 2018
mart added a comment.
In D17079#364263 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D17079#364263>, @apol wrote:
> In D17079#364163 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D17079#364163>, @ltoscano wrote:
>
> > In D17079#364157 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D17079#364157>, @mart wrote:
> >
> > > I think this ui should really go into KCoreAddons itself. Would it be accepted there?
> >
> >
> > kcoreaddons is tier1 just like kirigami. Why not create a new Frameworks, kirigami-addons (or another appropriate name), which would collect all the common UI items which depends on other frameworks? Basically the kxmlgui of Kirigami.
>
>
> I think an external framework is a big overkill. In this case, it's only runtime dependencies so both either kcoreaddons or kirigami could offer it. I would favor putting it in kirigami because there's the duck-typing opportunity there too, but it may be a stretch.
> That said, we'll need someone to register the KAbout* types somewhere too, but we can also rely on applications doing that as a first iteration.
one thing i'm a bit concerned is kirigami becomeing too much of a QML kdelibs monolith :p
REPOSITORY
R134 Discover Software Store
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D17079
To: apol, #plasma, #frameworks
Cc: mart, leinir, ngraham, ltoscano, plasma-devel, ragreen, Pitel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20181122/20db2a0d/attachment.html>
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list