D13813: Make this test work again with new uds implementation

[Albert Astals Cid]

aacid added a subscriber: dfaure.
aacid added a comment.


  In D13813#286358 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D13813#286358>, @jtamate wrote:
  
  > In D13813#286313 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D13813#286313>, @aacid wrote:
  >
  > > Did we break how KIO works and we're now going after the users of KIO and fixing them or was this a "bad usage" from starters that worked by chance?
  >
  >
  > We break how KIO works and we're now going after the users of KIO and fixing them.
  >  uds insert() is now only for insert, replace() is for insert or update. Since https://phabricator.kde.org/D12696
  
  
  @dfaure Are you aware we broke KIO backwards compatibility? Seems like we threw out of the window our compatibility promises for our of most important frameworks and really I don't understand why we did that in the sake of performance. If the performance boost was so great we could have introduced V2 classes and make people start using them, but breaking people's code seems really bad to me :/

REPOSITORY
  R318 Dolphin

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D13813

To: jtamate, #dolphin, #frameworks, elvisangelaccio
Cc: dfaure, aacid, ngraham, bruns, elvisangelaccio, kfm-devel, spoorun, navarromorales, isidorov, firef, andrebarros, emmanuelp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20180703/4328a4d1/attachment-0001.html>