[Differential] [Commented On] D4201: Make it possible to lower KCrash to tier 1

[Martin Gräßlin]

graesslin added a comment.


  In https://phabricator.kde.org/D4201#78639, @apol wrote:
  
  > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D4201#78631, @graesslin wrote:
  >
  > > I don't understand why a plugin architecture allows to move it to tier1. Is functionality split out? if yes, how does that help?
  >
  >
  > Ah, you are right, I forgot to mention it. I thought about this process as a 2-step, where the second step would be moving these handlers to `frameworksintegration`.
  
  
  Hmm, I don't like that. That turns frameworksintegration into the everything and the kitchen sink. Why should one depend on KIO to get a working KCrash?
  
  In the end that results in worse dependencies than before.

REPOSITORY
  R285 KCrash

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D4201

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: apol, #frameworks, dfaure
Cc: anthonyfieroni, graesslin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20170119/68ce642c/attachment.html>