D5521: Allow the KGlobalAccel be a "Tier 2" framework, if needed

[Martin Gräßlin]

graesslin added a comment.


  I don't really understand what this change is supposed to fix. Distributions will ship only one variant of kglobalaccel and that will most likely be the one which is wanted by KDE. If kglobalaccel is shipped without KCrash support I would consider this as a serious problem and report that to the distributions. Also given my experience about breakage in weird situations I'm against such build flexibility. KCrash is an important component for kglobalaccel and I'm not interested in having to spend time on bug reports because a distro mis-configured kglobalaccel.

REPOSITORY
  R268 KGlobalAccel

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D5521

To: palokisa, graesslin, mck182
Cc: apol, #frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20170420/9320abfc/attachment.html>