Review Request 129426: refactor gpg finding

[Harald Sitter]

> On Nov. 18, 2016, 8:05 p.m., Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> > CMakeLists.txt, line 37
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129426/diff/1/?file=485781#file485781line37>
> >
> >     that looks to me as if it does the opposite as in $description; prefer the old one to the new one.

You take offense with an if checking whether we can build with gpg support?


- Harald


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129426/#review100933
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 18, 2016, 2 p.m., Harald Sitter wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129426/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 18, 2016, 2 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Repository: kwallet
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> refactor gpg finding code to be correctly taking all FOUND vars into account, indicate itself as feature to cmake, prefer the new lib over the old one, not be duplicated in runtime and test dir, not require excessively shitty if's to be used.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 6145fda8ebd8470024396b9029d1f23298d1a333 
>   src/runtime/kwalletd/CMakeLists.txt 5092a7e77a1ca7203827e444c11310566b2cc8b5 
>   src/runtime/kwalletd/backend/CMakeLists.txt 2f99bc3cca89dd7a194f46cb314d2f7f90f931f3 
>   tests/kwalletd/CMakeLists.txt 1e7c4b77ba478147fae964f61c28a736e32b9ea9 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129426/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> builds and continues to link to gpg
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Harald Sitter
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20161118/bcbbd999/attachment.html>